<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.166 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:05:34 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Frederica.com - Essays - Christian Apologetics</title><subtitle>Writings</subtitle><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/atom.xml"/><updated>2013-04-30T15:21:37Z</updated><generator uri="http://five.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.166 (http://www.squarespace.com)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Remembering Fr. George Calciu</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Christian Life"/><category term="Orthodoxy"/><category term="Podcast"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/remembering-fr-george-calciu.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/remembering-fr-george-calciu.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2009-11-22T19:44:19Z</published><updated>2009-11-22T19:44:19Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">[Holy Cross Orthodox Church; November 22, 2009]</p>
<p>This weekend we are remembering the repose of Fr. George Calciu, who died on November 21, 2006, just two days before 81<sup>st</sup> birthday. He died of pancreatic cancer, a fast-moving and painful cancer, and had barely survived long enough to complete one last trip to his homeland, Romania.</p>
<p>&nbsp;The news reached us on a Sunday evening that he had taken a turn for the worse. Father Gregory and I were hosting a gathering for Orthodox young people at our home that night, but I left our guests and went with Chris Vladimir to the hospital.</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>The Voice Beneath the Altar</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Christian Life"/><category term="Orthodoxy"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/the-voice-beneath-the-altar.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/the-voice-beneath-the-altar.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2008-12-04T17:11:45Z</published><updated>2008-12-04T17:11:45Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[from <em>A Faith and Culture Devotional</em>, Zondervan, 2008]</p>
<p><em>When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain for the word of God and for the witness they had borne; they cried out with a loud voice, &#8220;O Sovereign Lord, holy and true, how long before thou wilt judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell upon the earth?&#8221;( Revelation 6:9-10)</em></p>
<p>During the first centuries of Christianity, the church was battered within and without. Pseudo-Christians distorted the faith and misled the faithful, while the powerful Roman Empire persecuted Christians with torture and death. When local church members were able to gather the remains of their fellow-believers (often, this was forbidden), they lovingly interred these broken bodies beneath their altars, a reminder that the blessed departed are invisibly present to join us in worship. St. John writes that, in his vision, he heard the voice of the martyrs crying out from under the altar.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Why CS Lewis is So Irritating! Part 2</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Podcast"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/why-cs-lewis-is-so-irritating-part-2.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/why-cs-lewis-is-so-irritating-part-2.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2008-10-30T15:34:00Z</published><updated>2008-10-30T15:34:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[<a href="http://ancientfaith.com/podcasts/frederica">Ancient Faith Radio</a>; October 30, 2008]</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">We&#8217;re back with another episode of &#8220;Why CS Lewis is So Irritating!&#8221;. And the reason that CS Lewis is so irritating, if you&#8217;re a writer, is that he already said everything. He could have left some stuff for me to come up with, but no, it&#8217;s all right there, and it&#8217;s beautiful, it&#8217;s elegant, it&#8217;s concise, it&#8217;s zing!, it&#8217;s just teriffic stuff. But he wasn&#8217;t very generous, he didn&#8217;t leave stuff over that I would eventually think of one day. </span></p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Why C. S. Lewis is So Irritating! Part 1</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Orthodoxy"/><category term="Podcast"/><category term="Pro-Life"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/why-c-s-lewis-is-so-irritating-part-1.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/why-c-s-lewis-is-so-irritating-part-1.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2008-10-23T14:41:00Z</published><updated>2008-10-23T14:41:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[<a href="http://ancientfaith.com/podcasts/frederica">Ancient Faith Radio</a>, October 23, 2008]</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s podcast is going to be one that I expect will be a continuing topic here, &#8220;Why CS Lewis is just so irritating.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why CS Lewis *is* just so irritating is because, he already said everything. And he said it better than I&#8217;ll ever say it. I find when I read him that I&#8217;m simultaneously just delighted and thrilled because he&#8217;s just put it perfectly, and it&#8217;s such a wonderful, original thought, and it&#8217;s even a little deeper, and then I think, darn it, if I&#8217;d had enough time I could have come up with that! Curses! Foiled again! I just have to not read him, because I just get so frustrated, because he says everything, and he says it better and more concisely and more delightfully, easier to grasp, and all that. I think this is probably similar to the scientist who thinks, Darn it, if Einstein hadn&#8217;t said E=MC<sup>2</sup>, I would have thought of that! Just give me enough time!</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Let's Create a Perfect World</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Christian Life"/><category term="The Culture"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/lets-create-a-perfect-world.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/lets-create-a-perfect-world.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2008-10-21T19:46:01Z</published><updated>2008-10-21T19:46:01Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[<a href="http://www.beliefnet.com/Faiths/Christianity/2008/10/Lets-Create-A-Perfect-World.aspx">Beliefnet.com</a>; October 21, 2008]</p>
<p>So you think that the existence of suffering proves that there is no God. But can I ask a question? How would you eliminate suffering? What would a world without suffering look like? You have free rein-make it any way you like.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t we start with something specific. People often cite the story told by the character Ivan in Dostoevsky&#8217;s <em>The Brothers Karamazov</em>: parents punished their little daughter for bedwetting by locking her in a frozen outhouse. Ivan cannot accept a God who would let that happen.</p>
<p>OK, how would you prevent it? Can you imagine a world where there is no child abuse? Not just that one awful case-there&#8217;s no point in stopping only one act of abuse. How would you stop child abuse entirely? Would you make it so that an angry parent could not think of any way to hurt a child?</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>A Voice in the Public Square</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Orthodoxy"/><category term="Podcast"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/a-voice-in-the-public-square.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/a-voice-in-the-public-square.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2008-10-09T14:53:00Z</published><updated>2008-10-09T14:53:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[<a href="http://ancientfaith.com/podcasts/frederica">Ancient Faith Radio</a>; October 9, 2008]<br> </p> <p> Frederica Mathewes-Green: I&#8217;m in the nave of the Church of Holy Ascension in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina on Route 17, just north of Charleston. I&#8217;m talking with the pastor, Fr. John Parker. Tell me a little about your journey to Orthodoxy, Father, as we get started. </p> <p> Fr. John Parker: Sure. Well, it all began during my Episcopal seminary experience in Ambridge, PA, when the library there had a sale on duplicate books. So they were 50 cents for paperbacks and a dollar for hardback books. </p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>The Same God</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Podcast"/><category term="The Culture"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/the-same-god.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/the-same-god.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2008-08-22T02:30:00Z</published><updated>2008-08-22T02:30:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[<a href="http://ancientfaith.com/podcasts/frederica">Ancient Faith Radio</a>; August 21, 2008]</p>
<p>I am in Anchorage, Alaska, a beautiful beautiful place, attending the Eagle River Institute. I am one of the speakers here, along with Fr. Michael Dahulich, who is the Dean of St. Tikhon&#8217;s Seminary. And this is sort of a series of study days that begins every year on August the 1st, and runs through August the 5th, and culminates with the feast of the Transfiguration. After that, many people go down to Kodiak to venerate the relics of St. Herman, and if the weather is fortunate, if the weather is agreeable, also to make a pilgrimage to Spruce Island. So we&#8217;re hoping that the weather will be with us and that my husband and I will be able to make that pilgrimage as well.</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Light and Evangelicals</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Christian Life"/><category term="Podcast"/><category term="The Culture"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/light-and-evangelicals.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/light-and-evangelicals.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2008-05-28T15:28:00Z</published><updated>2008-05-28T15:28:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[<a href="http://ancientfaith.com/podcasts/frederica">Ancient Faith Radio</a>; May 28, 2008]</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Today I wanted to touch on a couple podcasts from the past, one recent, one a little longer ago, because I&#8217;ve had some other interactions since those podcasts were posted, and it&#8217;s given me some more to think about. </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">One is the very recent one, about light and darkness. I got an email from someone who said, You know, I always pictured that before creation, God was in darkness; that darkness came first, because after all, it says that when God was creating the heavens and the earth, in the beginning of Genesis, Genesis 1: &#8220;The earth was without form and void, darkness was upon the face of the deep, God said, &#8216;Let There be Light&#8217;, and there was light&#8221;. I always thought that since he had to create light, that the first thing was actually darkness. </span></p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>A Golden Bell and a Pomegranate: Beauty and Apologetics</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Orthodoxy"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/a-golden-bell-and-a-pomegranate-beauty-and-apologetics.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/a-golden-bell-and-a-pomegranate-beauty-and-apologetics.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2008-05-04T18:19:46Z</published><updated>2008-05-04T18:19:46Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[Again; Spring 2008]<br /></p><p>&nbsp;<br />Back when I was attending seminary&mdash;this was an Episcopal seminary, in Virginia&mdash;every time I went to chapel I&rsquo;d see this Scripture painted on the back wall around the window: &ldquo;Go ye into all the world and preach the Gospel.&rdquo; I had plenty of time to study those words (especially when the sermon was boring). As I read and reread that saying of Jesus, I thought about what it takes to spread the Gospel. What tools do you need? </p> <p>First, obviously, you need to know what you&rsquo;re talking about. You must be thoroughly familiar with your faith, with its teachings and practices, with the Scriptures. You need information, knowledge stored up in your head. As St. Peter says, &ldquo;Always be prepared to make a defense to anyone who calls you to account for the faith that is in you&rdquo; (I Pet 3:15). </p> <p>You need something else, too: you need love. St. Matthew tells us that when Jesus saw the crowds &ldquo;he had compassion for them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd.&rdquo; A missionary&mdash;whether it&rsquo;s one who travels to another continent, or one who talks to a neighbor over a back fence&mdash;must have love and compassion for those who need the Gospel. It&rsquo;s no good to approach it like it&rsquo;s an argument you&rsquo;re determined to win. I knew an evangelical protestant once who believed that it was his job to tell every person he met about Christ. After that, it was up to them to act on it. If they didn&rsquo;t, he said, they&rsquo;d go to hell, but it wouldn&rsquo;t be his fault, because he told them.</p> <p>Well, he may have been conveying some information clearly (it might not be accurate information, but it sure was clear), but he didn&rsquo;t frame it with love. It didn&rsquo;t come from the heart, so it didn&rsquo;t have much chance of getting into someone else&rsquo;s heart. Without love, as St Paul says, we are nothing but &ldquo;a noisy gong or a clanging symbol.&rdquo; </p> <p>What does it take to be a missionary? You need to know your stuff, and you need to have a tender heart toward the people you are trying to reach. But there is one more thing that Orthodox Christianity would contribute to the ministry of evangelism: beauty. </p> <p>You&rsquo;ve heard of St. Vladimir, Prince of Kiev. It was under his reign that the Slavic people (that would be primarily contemporary Ukraine and Russia) became a Christian nation, in 988 AD. He would have been a challenging guy to evangelize. Vladimir was his father&rsquo;s youngest son, and born of a concubine, so he had to fight for the throne, and killed his brother in the process. He wanted to marry a princess but she rejected him because of his mother&rsquo;s low birth. So Vladimir killed her father and took her by force. Like many Asian princes he had a vast harem&#8212;7 wives and 800 concubines&#8212;and built temples to his pagan gods, where he offered human sacrifice, including Christians. Now, picture yourself ringing his doorbell, armed with a few tracts and the Orthodox Study Bible. </p> <p>But Vladimir eventually decided that his people should adopt a single religion, and representatives of Judaism, Islam, Western and Eastern Christianity came to the court and presented their arguments. After that he sent envoys out to visit their countries and observe each religion firsthand. </p> <p>When these delegates returned, they told Vladimir first what they saw among the Muslims in Bulgaria. The 11th century chronicle reports that they said, &ldquo;There is no joy among them, only sorrow and a great stench; their religion is not a good one.&rdquo; They spoke of the Western Christian churches they saw in Germany, and said, &ldquo;We saw many ceremonies in their temples, but of beauty we saw none.&rdquo; </p> <p>Then they said what they had seen at the great church of Hagia Sophia in Constantinople: </p> <p>&ldquo;We knew not whether we were in heaven or on earth, for on earth there is no such splendor or beauty, and we are at a loss to describe it. We only know that God dwells there among humans, and their worship is fairer than the ceremonies of other nations. </p> <p>&ldquo;And we cannot forget that beauty. Every man who has partaken of sweetness will not afterwards accept bitterness, and so we can no longer remain apart from it.&rdquo; </p> <p>That convinced Prince Vladimir. He was baptized in the Crimea, and ordered that the pagan idols be dragged from their temples and thrown into the river. The Orthodox Christian faith spread throughout the Slavic lands and grew deep and strong. It sustained them so well that, when Communists brought persecution with torture and imprisonment, some 20 million Orthodox believers died for their faith. </p> <p>Our Orthodox worship is strong on beauty. We fill the walls and even the ceilings of our churches with icons, the stories and heroes of Christian history. We illuminate these images with candles and oil lamps, and the light shimmers from the glossy paint and gold backgrounds. Our clergy and altar servers wear vestments of different colors of brocade, highlighted with gold and embroidered.</p> <p>People who visit an Orthodox service are immediately struck by the visual beauty, but that&rsquo;s not the only sense affected. The whole service is sung and chanted, so the words of our prayers are framed with music. Incense rises from golden pots of incense. We taste the Eucharistic bread and wine, venerate icons, touch the hem of the priest&rsquo;s vestment, and greet each other with a holy kiss. This is a very rich sensory experience, touching every one of the five senses. It&rsquo;s very similar to what Prince Vladimir&rsquo;s envoys saw at Hagia Sophia, because we are members of that very same world-wide, timeless church. </p> <p>Although beauty can help bring someone like Prince Vladimir to Orthodoxy, in our current culture some people mistrust it. They think it might lead to idolatry, and we might worship these beautiful things instead of looking through them to God. (I got an email once from a Baptist who had visited a Divine Liturgy, and noticed when the priest went by during the Great Entrance that some people bowed to venerate the hem of his garment. He asked me, &ldquo;Why are they worshipping the priest?&rdquo;) </p> <p>A few years ago I was being interviewed on an NPR program, and the host asked me, &ldquo;All this fancy stuff you do in church, the icons and candles and incense, doesn&rsquo;t it get in the way? Doesn&rsquo;t it distract you from worshipping God?&rdquo;</p> <p>I said, &ldquo;Imagine that it&rsquo;s your anniversary, and your husband has taken you to a nice restaurant. There&rsquo;s a white cloth on the table, roses and candles, a glass of wine, and violin music is playing in the background. Does that distract you from feeling romantic?&rdquo; </p> <p>Now, it&rsquo;s true, you can have all this beauty and just take it for granted. You can go to church every Sunday and just yawn your way through it. But that&rsquo;s not the fault of the church. A married couple could plow through a fancy meal without once looking each other in the eye. But that wouldn&rsquo;t be the fault of the restaurant. They did everything they could. Beauty is not enough, all by itself. It&rsquo;s not the goal, just a way toward the goal, which is life in Christ. </p> <p>Yet beauty in worship is not an option; it is something God commands. After the Israelites crossed the Red Sea, as they were wandering in the wilderness, God told Moses how to furnish a tent to be their place of worship. He told him, for example, that there needed to be a box to hold the two stone tablets of the Ten Commandments. </p> <p>Now, today we&rsquo;d say, &ldquo;Oh, sure,&rdquo; and run out to the mall and buy a clear plastic storage unit with a snap-on lid. But God did not ask for something merely functional. He told Moses to make this box, the Ark of the Covenant, from acacia wood, and to overlay it with gold&#8212;not only on the outside, but the inside as well. Even though the inside of the Ark would not be seen, it should be beautiful and costly, because it was being made for God. </p> <p>The Lord gave Moses further instructions: he said that the rings and poles for carrying the ark should be golden as well, and that a mercy seat should be placed on top of the ark. Two cherubim, also made of hammered gold, would face each other above it. And that&rsquo;s just the ark and mercy seat; there are also the table, the lampstand, the tabernacle, the veil, the altar, and the priestly vestments. All of these were likewise adorned with gold, silver, embroidery, and precious stones. The Lord is specific even about small details: he says that around the hem of the priests&rsquo; garments there are to be embroidered pomegranates of purple, blue, and red, interspersed with golden bells: &ldquo;a golden bell and a pomegranate, a golden bell and a pomegranate, round about on the skirts of the robe&rdquo; (Exodus 28:34). </p> <p>Think about it: even though the children of Israel were refugees, wandering in the desert and living in tents, God still commanded Moses to use extravagant resources in making worship beautiful. Beauty matters. As you picture this lavish worship space taking shape you can identify with Prince Vladimir&rsquo;s envoys: &ldquo;We knew not whether we were in heaven or on earth.&rdquo; Once that beauty had been tasted, they said, they could never be satisfied with anything less. </p> <p>As missionaries, at home or abroad, we must prepare ourselves to do the work God gives us. We must know the Scriptures well and have a good understanding of our faith, so that we can present it clearly. And we must have love for those we speak to, so they will feel welcomed and invited into God&rsquo;s household. </p> <p>But when a visitor comes to join us for worship, the focus is no longer on us, on our knowledge or our loving character. In worship, it&rsquo;s about God, and all signs must point in His direction. An atmosphere of beauty teaches wordlessly about the nature of God. It teaches that He is not just a concept to be endlessly discussed; that at some point our capacity to grasp him intellectually fails, and we fall before him in worship. Beyond all we know and cannot know about God, he reigns in beauty. Beauty opens our hearts, and stirs us to hunger for more, to hunger for the piercing sweetness of the presence of God. </p> <p>A visitor may not at first see what we&rsquo;re seeing, but he can see that we see something. When I was a child I was near-sighted, but no one realized this and a number of years passed before I got glasses. Till then I kept having the frustrating experience that my parents would want to show me something, but I couldn&rsquo;t see it. They would point, for example, at a bird in a treetop, and say, &ldquo;There it is, do you see it?&rdquo; And I would squint and try to follow the line of the pointing finger, and just see a greenish blob that was probably a tree. Sometimes I would say, &ldquo;No, I don&rsquo;t see it;&rdquo; sometimes I would pretend I had, just to get it over with. </p> <p>But you know what? I never said, &ldquo;There is no bird.&rdquo; </p> <p>When a visitor comes into our worship, he might not see what we&rsquo;re looking at&mdash;in this case, not a bird in a treetop, but God in His heaven. But the visitor can see us. He sees us worshipping with awe and gratitude, hears us singing ancient and Scriptural hymns that Christians around the world have offered for millennia. He sees candlelight flickering on the gold of icons, and hears the bells on the censer. He tastes the antidoron, smells the incense, and is greeted by other worshippers with the kiss of peace. Every one of his senses is affected. Maybe he doesn&rsquo;t yet see the Lord we worship, but he see us, and sees that we see something; that we are being held rapt by the presence of something awesome, terrible, beautiful. He can tell that something is going on. And that mysterious beauty is a hook that pulls people further in. </p> <p>Any missionary needs theological education, as well as love for those in the mission field. But we Orthodox know of one further element of missions: beauty. We worship in beauty because it is what God commanded. He instructed Moses to provide elaborate beauty in worship&#8212;gold, incense, embroidery, carved wood, vestments, &ldquo;a golden bell and a pomegranate.&rdquo; But not because God needs these things &ndash; as the psalmist says, he already owns the cattle on a thousand hills. No, it is we humans who need such things, and their use in worship empowers mission in ways that, literally, can&rsquo;t be conveyed in words. Beauty sets the heart aright, and opens it to God. </p><p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>The Historical Jesus</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Podcast"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/the-historical-jesus.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/the-historical-jesus.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2008-01-30T19:43:00Z</published><updated>2008-01-30T19:43:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[<a href="http://ancientfaith.com/podcasts/frederica">Ancient Faith Radio</a>; January 30, 2008]</p>
<p>There was a time, back in May of 2006, when The da Vinci Code movie was just about to come out, and then did come out and cause a lot of consternation among Christians of every description, Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox&#8212;controversy about this whole phenomenon, the terrifically popular pop novel, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Da Vinci Code</span>, and the high profile Hollywood movie that was made of that book. And a lot of worry about how can we respond to something that seems to be grasping the imagination of so many people, when you can hardly engage it; the basic ideas are so preposterous that it doesn&#8217;t have any historic grounding, you don&#8217;t know how to grapple with it.</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Bethlehem Star</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Orthodoxy"/><category term="Podcast"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/bethlehem-star.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/bethlehem-star.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2007-12-19T19:56:00Z</published><updated>2007-12-19T19:56:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[<a href="http://ancientfaith.com/podcasts/frederica">Ancient Faith Radio</a>; December 19, 2007]</p>
<p>Recently I was interviewed by a TV show, Religion and Ethics Newsweekly, which appears on PBS, for a story they were doing about the Bethlehem star. And the interviewer told me that she had talked to an astronomer and another person, a Christian, who had done a lot of research into the astronomical records that were kept by the Chinese and by the Egyptians. And there are various theories&#8212;you know, a lot of people have theories about what dramatic heavenly event it could have been that would have brought constellations together, or brought comets together or something to fill the role of that star.</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>From Arguing to Rejoicing</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Orthodoxy"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/from-arguing-to-rejoicing.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/from-arguing-to-rejoicing.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2007-07-28T18:32:13Z</published><updated>2007-07-28T18:32:13Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[Beliefnet, &#8220;Crunchy Cons&#8221;; July 27, 2007]&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;<br />On July 26, 2007, Rod Dreher posted on his blog on Beliefnet.com, &#8220;Crunchy Cons,&#8221; the piece in the current Again Magazine about our from Anglican to Orthodox. He asked people to write in telling what triggered them to leave a church or a belief, or what caused them to decide to stay despite difficulties.</p> <p>********</p> <p>Thanks, Rod, for posting this and launching a strong conversation. </p> <p>Daniel, thanks for this: &lt;&lt;Why, after 16 years, does Matthews-Green still talk about her difference with the Episcopal church and use it as a way to covert people to her little corner of Orthodoxy? &gt;&gt;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Barbara Nicolosi on Hollywood for Christians</title><category term="Arts"/><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Movie Reviews"/><category term="Podcast"/><category term="The Culture"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/barbara-nicolosi-on-hollywood-for-christians.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/barbara-nicolosi-on-hollywood-for-christians.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2007-06-15T14:56:00Z</published><updated>2007-06-15T14:56:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">[<a title="" href="http://ancientfaith.com/podcasts/frederica">Ancient Faith Radio</a>; June 15, 2007]<br></p><p class="MsoNormal">Frederica: Here we are.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span>I’m at a beautiful outdoor café, what was the name of this place?<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I’ve forgotten already.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Tree, something, Italiano, I think. [Laughs]<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I’m looking around, I’m trying to see if
there’s a sign.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Anyway, I’m in <st1:placename w:st="on">Malibu</st1:placename> <st1:placetype w:st="on">Village</st1:placetype>
in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Malibu</st1:city>, <st1:state w:st="on">California</st1:state></st1:place> on an overcast day.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>It’s pleasantly cool; it’s just perfect here,
as it so often is.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>June gloom, I’m
told.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I’m sitting here with my friend,
Barbara Nicolosi, who is a screenwriter, who is a teacher of screenwriting and
has a number of other talents and one of the things that frustrates her is
Christians that think they’re going to write a screenplay and convert the world
to Christianity with a script that is pretty unprofessional.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>But let me let you speak for yourself; just
start in anywhere.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Hit it, Barbara.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>They can’t see you moving your hands and
making faces; you’ve actually got to – [laughs]</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>The Lost Gospel of Mary: Who Was She?</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Christian Life"/><category term="Gender"/><category term="Orthodoxy"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/the-lost-gospel-of-mary-who-was-she.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/the-lost-gospel-of-mary-who-was-she.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2007-02-01T16:49:17Z</published><updated>2007-02-01T16:49:17Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[excerpted from &#8220;The Lost Gospel of Mary,&#8221; Paraclete Press, 2007]<br /></p><h3>The Beloved Virgin Mary</h3><p><br />Who was she? <br /><br />It is hard to see Mary clearly, beneath the conflicting identities she has borne over the centuries. To one era she is the flower of femininity, and to another the champion of feminism; in one age she is the paragon of obedience, and in another the advocate of liberation. Some enthusiasts have been tempted to pile her status so high that it rivals that of her Son. Others, aware that excessive adulation can be dangerous, do their best to ignore her entirely. <br /><br />Behind all that there is a woman nursing a baby. The child in her arms looks into her eyes. Years later he will look at her from the cross, through a haze of blood and sweat.</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>"Gifts of the Desert" Book Review</title><category term="Christian Apologetics"/><category term="Orthodoxy"/><id>http://www.frederica.com/writings/gifts-of-the-desert-book-review.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.frederica.com/writings/gifts-of-the-desert-book-review.html"/><author><name>Frederica</name></author><published>2006-05-31T16:49:04Z</published><updated>2006-05-31T16:49:04Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>[Touchstone, June 2006]&nbsp;</p><p>Gifts of the Desert: The Forgotten Path of Christian Spirituality<br />By Kyriacos C. Markides<br />Doubleday, 2005<br />(370 pages, $23.95, hardback)<br /><br />Dr. Markides is a sociology professor at the University of Maine, and his research has led him to conclusions that are rare among social sciences academics. Markides has come to believe that we are surrounded by unseen spiritual realities, and that it is possible, through repentance and prayer, to encounter and be transformed by them.</p>]]></summary></entry></feed>